Abstract
Dynamic processes in catalysis are gaining increased attention and could very well be one of the next frontiers in surface science. One way to study such processes is to induce chemical changes on the surface for example by periodically adjusting the (electro)chemical potential in situ and identify the resulting spectral changes. Often this is referred to as Modulation Excitation Spectroscopy (MES). Using Ambient Pressure Photoelectron Spectroscopy data, we here discuss and compare the analysis of MES data using both Phase Sensitive Detection (PSD) and Fourier analysis. We discuss that PSD determines the component magnitude at a user-defined phase value while Fourier analysis provides the maximum oscillation amplitude and respective phase value of oscillating spectral features. We discuss advantages and disadvantages of the different analysis schemes and explore how the full time-evolution can be obtained.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
