Abstract

AbstractThis paper discusses the framework for comparing independent study means (SMs) with averages of aggregated study mean paleomagnetic poles, hereafter referred to as reference poles, contributing to continental or global apparent polar wander paths (GAPWP). Paleomagnetists typically compare individual SMs to these population means to compute latitudinal displacements or rotations with uncertainties estimated by comparing A95's. Using this comparison statistic, more than half of the population of reference SMs contributing to a GAPWP fall at an angular distance that is greater than their combined uncertainties. Two approaches are presented that yield similar results based on different rationales and comparison statistics. Common to both approaches is K95,GAPWP, the angular distance within which 95% of poles contributing to an APWP mean fall. One approach combines K95,GAPWP and the A95,SM of the independent study mean that can only be judged to be significantly displaced if the angular difference with the GAPWP mean exceeds their combined uncertainty. The second approach uses K95,GAPWP as the best estimate of total error of each study mean, which when combined with uncertainty of the GAPWP mean, A95,GAPWP, defines the angular difference that the independent study mean needs to exceed to be judged to be significantly displaced from a GAPWP mean. These comparison statistics are used to assess paleomagnetic support for Greater Indian Basin hypothesis for the paleogeographic evolution of the northern margin of India prior to collision with Asia. The Greater Indian Basin hypothesis is not supported based on these more rigorous criteria.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call