Abstract

Analysis of spike and local field potential (LFP) data is an essential part of neuroscientific research. Today there exist many open-source toolboxes for spike and LFP data analysis implementing various functionality. Here we aim to provide a practical guidance for neuroscientists in the choice of an open-source toolbox best satisfying their needs. We overview major open-source toolboxes for spike and LFP data analysis as well as toolboxes with tools for connectivity analysis, dimensionality reduction and generalized linear modeling. We focus on comparing toolboxes functionality, statistical and visualization tools, documentation and support quality. To give a better insight, we compare and illustrate functionality of the toolboxes on open-access dataset or simulated data and make corresponding MATLAB scripts publicly available.

Highlights

  • Analysis of spike and local field potential (LFP) data is an essential part of neuroscientific research (Brown et al, 2004; Stevenson and Kording, 2011; Mahmud and Vassanelli, 2016)

  • We aim to provide a practical guidance for choosing a proper toolbox on the basis of toolbox functionality, statistical and visualization tools, programming language, availability of graphical user interface, support and documentation quality

  • Bold values indicate the number of citations higher than 90

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Analysis of spike and local field potential (LFP) data is an essential part of neuroscientific research (Brown et al, 2004; Stevenson and Kording, 2011; Mahmud and Vassanelli, 2016). There are many already implemented open-source tools and toolboxes for spike and LFP data analysis. Ascertaining whether functionality of the toolbox fits users’ requirements is in many cases time-consuming. Often neuroscientists are even not aware that some functionality is already implemented and start writing their own scripts from scratch which takes time and is error-prone. Compared to the existing reviews (Ince et al, 2009, 2010; Ince, 2012; Mahmud and Vassanelli, 2016; Timme and Lapish, 2018), we

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.