Abstract
Recent efforts have been made to coalesce object-oriented methods and object-oriented modelling languages and, at the same time, to put them on a more rigorous footing by the use of metamodelling techniques. Two so-called third-generation approaches, OPEN (a full methodology) and UML (a modelling language) are described and compared here. These two approaches are compared by focusing on two main areas: (1) process and lifecycle support and, predominantly, (2) metamodel and notation.
Full Text 
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Paper version not known
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
