Abstract

This study investigates the emissions of various industrial facilities under start-up, shut-down, and normal operations. The industries that have been investigated include power and/or heat generation, energy-from-waste generation, nuclear power generation, sulphuric acid production, ethylene production, petrochemical production, and waste incineration. The study investigated multiple facilities worldwide for each of these industrial categories. The different potential contaminants characteristic of each industry type have been investigated and the emissions of these contaminants under non-steady state have been compared to the steady state emissions. Where available, trends have been developed to identify the circumstances, i.e., the industrial sector and contaminant, under which the assessment and consideration of emissions from start-up and shut-down events is necessary for each industry. These trends differ by industrial sector and contaminant. For example, the study shows that sulphur dioxide (SO2) emissions should be assessed for the start-up operations of sulphuric acid production plants, but may not need to be assessed for the start-up operations of a conventional power generation facility. The trends developed as part of this research paper will help air permit applicants to effectively allocate their resources when assessing emissions related to non-steady state operations. Additionally, it will ensure that emissions are assessed for the worst-case scenario. This is especially important when emissions under start-up and shut-down operations have the potential to exceed enforceable emission limits. Thus, assessing emissions for the worst-case scenario can help in preventing the emissions from adversely impacting public health and the environment.

Highlights

  • In the United States, the regulatory structure and framework pertaining to air permits is dependent on the requirement of a facility to meet emission limits for different contaminants as set out in the applicable regulations [1,2]

  • The facilities were located in Canada, the United States, the United Kingdom (UK) and Australia

  • The results show that, for the liquefied natural gas (LNG) processing facility, the NOx and NO2 emissions were lower for start-up and shut-down than for normal operation, while the particulate matter (PM) emissions had a reversed trend [28]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In the United States, the regulatory structure and framework pertaining to air permits is dependent on the requirement of a facility to meet emission limits for different contaminants as set out in the applicable regulations [1,2]. Emission Factors, published by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S EPA) [1,3]. The use of these emission factors to estimate emissions is encouraged by regulatory agencies [1,3]. It is Energies 2017, 10, 179; doi:10.3390/en10020179 www.mdpi.com/journal/energies

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.