Abstract
ABSTRACT Cataloguing and classifying celestial objects is one of the fundamental activities of observational astrophysics. In this work, we compare the contents of two comprehensive data bases, the NASA Extragalactic Database (NED) and Set of Identifications, Measurements and Bibliography for Astronomical Data (SIMBAD) in the vicinity of nearby galaxies. These two data bases employ different classification schemes – one flat and one hierarchical – and our goal was to determine the compatibility of classifications for objects in common. Searching both data bases for objects within the respective isophotal radius of each of the ∼1300 individual galaxies in the Local Volume Galaxy sample, we found that, on average, NED contains about 10 times as many entries as SIMBAD and about two-thirds of SIMBAD objects are matched by position to a NED object, at 5 arcsec tolerance. These quantities do not depend strongly on the properties of the parent galaxies. We developed an algorithm to compare individual object classifications between the two data bases and found that 88 per cent of the classifications agree; we conclude that NED and SIMBAD contain consistent information for sources in common in the vicinity of nearby galaxies. Because many galaxies have numerous sources contained only in one of NED or SIMBAD, researchers seeking the most complete picture of an individual galaxy’s contents are best served by using both data bases.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.