Comparing nasal suction devices in children with bronchiolitis: A pilot randomized control trial

Abstract

Background/objectivesBronchiolitis is the most common cause of lower respiratory tract infections that lead to hospitalizations in infants and young children. MethodsIn this randomized controlled pilot study, we compared two separate nasal suction devices, namely the over counter device by the brand name of NoseFrida and the standard hospital device NeoSucker, in hospitalized children with bronchiolitis to assess equivalence of length of stay within a ± 5-h equivalence margin and to compare readmission rates and associated complications. Additionally, parental satisfaction for the NoseFrida device was measured with a six question (5-point Likert scale) survey. ResultsThere were 20 patients randomized to the NeoSucker group and 24 randomized to the NoseFrida group. The mean length of stay for the NoseFrida group was 33.5 ± 25.4 h compared to 31.0 ± 15.6 h in the NeoSucker group, which did not establish equivalence within the ±5-h equivalence margin (p = 0.352). Parents were generally satisfied with the NoseFrida. Patients treated with the two devices had similar frequencies of deep suctioning and readmission within 48 h. ConclusionsAlthough the mean length of stay was comparable for bronchiolitis patients treated with the NoseFrida and NeoSucker, the relatively small sample size and large amount of variability precluded demonstrating equivalence. Since this was a pilot, further studies are needed to evaluate the recommendation for the use of such devices in both the hospital setting and in the outpatient management of bronchiolitis.