Abstract
AbstractFecal-pellet surveys provide density estimates of pellet groups, which offer a quick and reliable index of population densities for white-tailed deer Odocoileus virginianus and other wildlife species. Comparisons of differing fecal-pellet survey methodologies have previously shown that they vary in the precision. However, researchers made these comparisons outside of the United States in regions with lower white-tailed deer densities. In this study, we compared pellet-group density estimates and precision from line transects, quadrat sampling, and strip transects. At each site, three observers surveyed simultaneously with each being responsible for one method. Like other studies, we found that each method produced similar estimates of pellet-group density, but quadrat sampling produced the most precise estimates. Furthermore, all three methods suggested that the central region of Indiana had both the highest pellet-group density and the highest precision. These results suggest a more homogenous distribution of pellet groups in areas with higher white-tailed deer densities, which may increase the precision of all methods. Our results suggest that quadrat sampling may be the most effective method for estimating pellet-group densities within woodlots of the U.S. Midwest, and that precision may increase in areas with higher white-tailed deer densities. This study not only improves deer management within the Midwest but provides guidelines for other studies to potentially advance the conservation and management of other species.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have