Comparing Kurtosis-adjusted weighted levels with other metrics to assess the risk of hearing loss from non-Gaussian noise exposures

Abstract

Several studies have shown that impulsive noise can cause more damage to hearing than steady-state noise of equal energy. As a result, a large body of research has been devoted to evaluating the hazards of impulsive noise. However, work environments often have varying noise patterns, including Gaussian background noise combined with high-level transient noises contributing to the worker's daily dose. Thus, an energy-based noise metric underestimates the risk of hearing loss unless incorporating a temporal structure correction term. Kurtosis has been reported as an effective adjunct to energy for predicting hearing hazards from non-Gaussian noise exposures. In this work, recordings of real impulsive noise were conducted using a portable measuring system at a very high sampling frequency and using high-pressure microphones. Controlled synthetic non-Gaussian noise was generated using these impulsive signals and steady-state background noise. After exploring the detailed temporal structure of the noise, the daily exposure time has been determined using different metrics, including kurtosis-adjusted weighted levels, weighted peak levels, and auditory risk units. The examples presented here aim to demonstrate how kurtosis can help develop more accurate methods to prevent noise-induced hearing loss.