Abstract
ABSTRACT Resources for export promotion are scarce, and incorrect market selection can be costly. In the literature, the gravity model, International Trade Center’s Export Potential Map, and decision support model all estimate export potential values. Although the same concept is measured, different methodologies are used. This study aimed to compare the rankings assigned to the export potential values by each approach. The results indicated that 45% of the rankings differed by more than five places, while one-third were ranked in the top 10 of only one approach. Given these inconsistencies, alternative approaches for prioritization after identifying export opportunities are recommended.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
