Comparing HMME-PDT and Cynergy dual-wavelength laser in the treatment of facial PWS

Abstract

BackgroundPulsed dye laser (PDL) is the gold-standard therapy for port-wine stains (PWSs), but the therapeutic efficacies vary widely with each individual. Recent studies suggest that hematoporphyrin monomethyl ether-photodynamic therapy (HMME-PDT) is an effective alternative in the treatment of PWS. This retrospective study aimed to compare the effects of HMME-PDT and Cynergy dual-wavelength laser on red and purple color types of PWS MethodsThis retrospective study included 38 PWS patients who received Cynergy dual-wavelength laser treatment (PDL group) and 39 PWS patients who received HMME-PDT treatment (HMME-PDT group). Patients in each group received two treatments. The curative effect of purple or red PWS in two groups was analyzed. ResultsAfter the first treatment, the total significant response rate and the total response rate of the HMME-PDT group were 43.59% and 74.36%, which were significantly higher than those of the PDL group (5.26% and 47.36%) (P < 0.05). After the second treatment, the total significant response rate and the total response rate of the HMME-PDT group were 69.23% and 100%, which were obviously higher than those of the PDL group (34.21% and 68.42%) (P < 0.05). For both groups, the total significant response rate of purple-type PWS was remarkably higher than that of red-type PWS (the HMME-PDT group: P = 0.004; the PDL group: P = 0.048). There was no obvious difference in terms of patient age and PWS location between the HMME-PDT and PDL groups. Furthermore, there was no considerable difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups (P > 0.05). ConclusionThe single-center retrospective study suggested that HMME-PDT might have better efficacies on purple and red PWS than PDL treatment. The total treatment efficacy was greater in purple-type PWS than in red-type PWS.