Abstract

RationaleBiomarker research for Alzheimer's disease (AD) has grown rapidly in recent years, ensuing the integration of the AD fluid biomarker profile: Aβ1-42, t-tau, and p-tau181, into clinical and research criteria. However, current insights of AD arise almost exclusively from studies on white individuals. Some studies have revealed that epidemiology, clinical features, and genetics of AD show variations between individuals from black and white backgrounds, conveying the importance of ethnoracial differences, and the possibility of such differences also influencing AD biomarker levels. This systematic review explored whether AD fluid biomarker levels differ between African American (AA) or Black African and white groups. AimTo compare AD fluid biomarkers (Aβ1-42, p-tau181, and t-tau) levels between AA or Black Africans and white individuals. MethodPubMed, Scopus, and other sources were explored for studies that quantified AD biomarkers in biological fluid from whites and AA or Black African groups. Meta-analyses were performed to find the standardized mean difference for biomarkers that were quantified in ≥3 studies. ResultsFive studies were included; studies on Black Africans were not found. The meta-analyses found CSF t-tau and p-tau181 were consistently lower in AA than white individuals, in samples with normal cognition or with mild cognitive impairment/dementia. ConclusionsThe meta-analyses found significant differences for CSF tau between AA and white individuals with normal cognition and within the dementia spectrum, expressing the importance of taking into account ethnoracial factors when interpreting CSF AD biomarkers levels. However, the generalisability of these differences is restricted by small samples' size, lack of unified methodologies and recruitment's biases within studies; further large multicentre studies with harmonized protocols and sufficient power are imperative to investigate the extent of ethnoracial differences across the spectrum of cognitive decline, with vaster efforts necessary to diversify recruitment.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.