Abstract
The task of this study is primarily to investigate the differences between English and Mo/Deg nominal group (NG) qualifiers to identify any similarities within the NG qualification structures of these languages. In otherwise, the study finds answers to the questions: “What are the qualifying elements within the Mo/Deg and English NGs?” and “What are the differences and similarities between the Mo/Deg NG qualification and that of English?” Using homogeneous sampling, the study purposefully sampled thirty (30) educated Mos/Dega (speakers of the Mo/Deg language). Short simple English sentences containing NG qualifiers designed by the researcher were given to them to translate into Mo/Deg. This was to see how the qualifiers are used in the language. Also, some of these sentences were given to some members of the staff of the Mo/Deg project of GILLBT to translate into Mo/Deg for further correct use of the qualifiers in the Mo/Deg language. The translated versions were then collected as data and analysed based on the Systemic Grammar principles of the NG structure. The results showed that the adjectival groups (AdjG), the clause, the numerals, and the determiners (pre-central, central, and post-central) occur at the qualifier position in Mo/Deg, whereas in English, it is the prepositional groups (PG), the adjectival groups (AdjG) (under some conditions), and the clause, which occupy the qualifier slot. However, it was also found out that the common linguistic units which occur in both languages as qualifiers are the adjectival groups and the clause.
Highlights
Language identifies one as a member of a particular society or group
The study identified the following differences and similarities: The qualifying position within the English nominal group (NG) can be filled by the prepositional group, the adjectival group, or the clause
In Mo/Deg, it is occupied by the adjectival, the clause; the numerals, and the determiners. 6.1 Differences The prepositional groups in English occupy the qualifying position within the NG structure, but, in Mo/Deg, they cannot occur at the qualifying position
Summary
Language identifies one as a member of a particular society or group It is the only means by which humans conduct their activities. Learning a second language formally goes with a number of challenges, especially, if the underlying principles of the grammar or syntax of that second or target language are not similar to those of one’s first language Perhaps it is to make things easier for one to learn another language that prompts Bresnan (2001:3) to suggest to linguists to design a universal grammar of all human languages that “underlines their superficial variations in modes of expression.”. The Longoro dialect in particular borrows words extensively from Akan than its Mangom counterpart As a result, it has an unusually complex structure which is sometimes not different from that of Akan, Sisaala, Gonja, or Vagla.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
