Abstract
Background: Low back pain (LBP) afflicts 6080% of the people worldwide at some point in their lifetime. Association of spinal muscle spasm justifies centrally acting muscle relaxants in the treatment. Controversial superiority of eperisone visa-vis thiocolchicoside was instrumental to inception of this research. Aims and Objectives: This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of eperisone with thiocolchicoside in treatment of non-specific LBP. Materials and Methods: This follow-up study was done in C. R. G. Hospital, Ujjain (India). Eligible 215 patients, of either sex, between 18 and 60 years from the outpatient orthopedic department were included and dysfunctional status was quantified by modified Oswestry Disability Index. The patients were given eperisone hydrochloride 100 mg 3 times daily or thiocolchicoside 8 mg twice daily. The analgesic activity and adverse drug reactions were evaluated on the follow-up visit after 7 days of treatment against the baseline. Results: Of 196 patients who completed the study, females were more (119; 60.71%) than the male (77; 39.28%). Mean score ± standard deviation of disability decreased from 26.13 ± 8.28 at baseline to 11.47 ± 4.86 in eperisone group and from 24.78 ± 7.24 at baseline to 9.92 ± 3.63 in thiocolchicoside group. Change in the score against the baseline was statistically significant (P < 0.05) in both the groups but insignificant across the groups. Adverse events experienced were less with eperisone. Conclusion: Compared to thiocolchicoside, eperisone hydrochloride is equipotent but better tolerated option in LBP.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.