Abstract
INTRODUCTION: We examined differences between hospital-affiliated clinics and non-hospital-affiliated (independent of Planned Parenthood) clinics regarding abortion service innovation in response to the early COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We analyzed data from the third phase of a longitudinal nationwide survey of abortion providers conducted by the Society of Family Planning (collected August to October 2020). We analyzed adoption of abortion service innovation, comparing hospital-affiliated clinics to non-hospital-affiliated clinics that included adoption of no- or low-test or low-touch practices for medication abortion and first-trimester surgical abortion. RESULTS: Sixty-one clinics completed the survey (30 hospital affiliated, 31 non-hospital affiliated). We found hospital-affiliated clinics were more likely to be in the Northeast and West (P<.01). We found evidence of adoption, but no significant difference between clinic type in changes in gestational limit, changes in Rh testing policy, or adoption or expansion of telehealth services for pre-abortion counseling. Hospital-affiliated clinics were more likely to have reported making any change to abortion services in response to the pandemic (100% versus 87%, P<.04). Hospital-affiliated clinics were also significantly more likely to start/expand telemedicine visits for follow-up visits for medication abortion (odds ratio [OR] 6.63, 95% CI 1.6–26.8) and first-trimester surgical abortion (OR 12.75, 95% CI 3.1–51.9). CONCLUSION: Abortion care changed quickly, regardless of setting, when the stresses of COVID-19 hit the U.S. health care system. System-wide abortion care changes suggest successful information sharing regarding best practices and recommendations in abortion provision, which should continue to be promoted as the pandemic continues.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have