Abstract
ObjectivesTo compare contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) and iodine discrimination thresholds on iodine maps derived from dual energy CT (DECT) and subtraction CT (SCT).MethodsA contrast-detail phantom experiment was performed with 2 to 15 mm diameter tubes containing water or iodinated contrast concentrations ranging from 0.5 mg/mL to 20 mg/mL. DECT scans were acquired at 100 kVp and at 140 kVp+Sn filtration. SCT scans were acquired at 100 kVp. Iodine maps were created by material decomposition (DECT) or by subtraction of water scans from iodine scans (SCT). Matched exposure levels varied from 8 to 15 mGy. Iodine discrimination thresholds (Cr) and response times were determined by eight observers.ResultsThe adjusted mean CNR was 1.9 times higher for SCT than for DECT. Exposure level had no effect on CNR. All observers discriminated all details ≥10 mm at 12 and 15 mGy. For sub-centimetre details, the lowest calculated Cr was ≤ 0.50 mg/mL for SCT and 0.64 mg/mL for DECT. The smallest detail was discriminated at ≥4.4 mg/mL with SCT and at ≥7.4 mg/mL with DECT. Response times were lower for SCT than DECT.ConclusionsSCT results in higher CNR and reduced iodine discrimination thresholds compared to DECT for sub-centimetre details.Key Points• Subtraction CT iodine maps exhibit higher CNR than dual-energy iodine maps• Lower iodine concentrations can be discriminated for sub-cm details with SCT• Response times are lower using SCT compared to dual-energy CT
Highlights
Materials and methodsIodine mapping is among the most frequently reported clinical applications of dual energy computed tomography (DECT) [1,2,3,4,5,6]
Median response times for all details above the concentrations required (Cr) for both techniques were significantly lower for Subtraction CT (SCT) (1.9 s) than DECT (2.3 s), p
Both the 10 and 15 mm diameter details were discriminated in DECT and SCT for all concentrations at 12 mGy and 15 mGy exposures
Summary
Materials and methodsIodine mapping is among the most frequently reported clinical applications of dual energy computed tomography (DECT) [1,2,3,4,5,6]. SCT provides an attractive alternative to DECT in the context of iodine mapping because it does not require the special hardware necessary for dual energy CT. For the successful implementation of SCT, only software for accurate registration and subtraction are prerequisites. Both techniques are quantitative in that the signal intensity of the iodine maps is proportional to the iodine uptake [12, 21]. Some vendors implemented this proportionality to allow the user to assess the local iodine concentration [21]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.