Abstract

Abstract Predicting students’ academic performance is a critical research area, yet imbalanced educational datasets, characterized by unequal academic-level representation, present challenges for classifiers. While prior research has addressed the imbalance in binary-class datasets, this study focuses on multi-class datasets. A comparison of ten resampling methods (SMOTE, Adasyn, Distance SMOTE, BorderLineSMOTE, KmeansSMOTE, SVMSMOTE, LN SMOTE, MWSMOTE, Safe Level SMOTE, and SMOTETomek) is conducted alongside nine classification models: K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), Quadratic Discriminant Analysis (QDA), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Logistic Regression (LR), Extra Tree (ET), Random Forest (RT), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), and Ada Boost (AdaB). Following a rigorous evaluation, including hyperparameter tuning and 10 fold cross-validations, KNN with SmoteTomek attains the highest accuracy of 83.7%, as demonstrated through an ablation study. These results emphasize SMOTETomek’s effectiveness in mitigating class imbalance in educational datasets and highlight KNN’s potential as an educational data mining classifier.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.