Abstract
Introduction: The aims of the study were to examine the relationship between examiner and child aesthetic component (AC) of the index of orthodontic need (IOTN) and the child perception questionnaire (CPQ), and to establish the validity of the IOTN AC or CPQ scores with respect to how bothered the child is by his or her teeth and how upset the child would be if unable to receive orthodontic treatment. Method and material: The sample comprised 174 untreated school children (mean age 11.7 years) selected from 10 schools in Bristol, United Kingdom. An examiner independently scored each child for the AC. The CPQ (a component of the child oral-health quality of life questionnaire) is aimed at children aged 11 to 14 years and consists of 37 questions answered on 5-point Likert scales. Results: The AC scores as rated by the examiner and the child had a modest correlation; the children tended to give themselves significantly lower scores than did the examiner. A very low but statistically significant correlation was found between self-perceived AC scores and overall CPQ score. The examiner’s AC scores had lower correlation sections in the CPQ; the only section that had a significant correlation with the examiner’s AC was the emotional impact section. Conclusions: The CPQ has validity for children’s concerns with their teeth. The low association between the CPQ and the AC of the IOTN suggests that they might be measuring different attributes. The authors recommend a shift toward quality-of-life measures to supplement the IOTN in assessing the perceived need for orthodontic treatment.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: American Journal of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopedics
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.