Abstract
Compare problems involve relationships between quantities. In inconsistent language (IL) formats, relational terms conflict with solution operations. Lewis and Mayer’s (1987) consistency hypothesis, which explains likely translations of IL problems to match problem solvers’ schemas, is examined Using think-aloud and recall data. Supporting hypotheses, students committed more errors overall and reversal errors specifically (i.e., used opposite operation) on IL than their consistent language (CL) counterparts and recalled IL problems as CL problems especially following reversal errors. Counter to expectations, language consistency did not result in differences in behaviors, reading or response times, or quality of recall. Additional analyses indicate a strong impact of fraction-of-a-number relational terms and provide evidence of difficulties forming representations and solving problems involving fraction-of-a-number construction.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
