Abstract
BackgroundThere are varying degrees of compatibility between malaria parasite-mosquito species, and understanding this compatibility may be crucial for developing effective transmission-blocking vaccines. This study investigates the compatibility of different biological forms of a malaria vector, Anopheles stephensi, to Plasmodium berghei ANKA strain.MethodsSeveral biologically different and allopatric forms of A. stephensi were studied. Three forms were isolated from different regions of southern Iran: the variety mysorensis, the intermediate form and the native type form, and an additional type form originated from India (Beech strain).The mosquitoes were experimentally infected with P. berghei to compare their susceptibility to parasitism. Anti-mosquito midgut antiserum was then raised in BALB/cs mice immunized against gut antigens from the most susceptible form of A. stephensi (Beech strain), and the efficacy of the antiserum was assessed in transmission-blocking assays conducted on the least susceptible mosquito biological form.ResultsThe susceptibility of different biological forms of A. stephensi mosquito to P. berghei was specifically inter-type varied. The Beech strain and the intermediate form were both highly susceptible to infection, with higher oocyst and sporozoite infection rates than intermediate and mysorensis forms. The oocyst infection, and particularly sporozite infection, was lowest in the mysorensis strain. Antiserum raised against midgut proteins of the Indian Beech type form blocked infection in this mosquito population, but it was ineffective at blocking both oocyst and sporozoite development in the permissive but geographically distant intermediate form mosquitoes. This suggests that a strong degree of incompatibility exists between the mosquito strains in terms of midgut protein(s) acting as putative ookinete receptors.ConclusionsThe incompatibility in the midgut protein profiles between two biological forms of A. stephensi demonstrates a well-differentiated population structure according to geographical origin. Therefore, the design of potential transmission-blocking strategies should incorporate a more thorough understanding of intra-species variations in host-parasite interactions.
Highlights
Many different strains and species of malaria parasite exist, and this is true for their mosquito hosts
Understanding evolution in host– parasite interactions in spatially structured populations is important in both basic and applied biology, and it may impact significantly on the successful development and deployment of malaria transmission-blocking vaccines (TBVs), if the goal is a global TBV that works across all anopheline species [10]
The four A. stephensi mosquito populations were fed a blood meal containing P. berghei and an overall infection rate was calculated for each biological form as the percentage of mosquitoes with oocysts present in their midgut
Summary
Many different strains and species of malaria parasite exist, and this is true for their mosquito hosts. The vectorial capacity of malaria vectors for different Plasmodium species is greatly influenced by the diverse characteristics of the plasmodial parasite and eco-ethological attributes of the mosquito [1]. Such variations in vectorial capacity between individuals and strains within vector populations have been reported in Anopheles gambiae Giles, 1902 [2], A. maculipennis [3], A. albimanus [4,5] and A. culicifacies [6]. Understanding evolution in host– parasite interactions in spatially structured populations is important in both basic and applied biology, and it may impact significantly on the successful development and deployment of malaria transmission-blocking vaccines (TBVs), if the goal is a global TBV that works across all anopheline species [10]. This study investigates the compatibility of different biological forms of a malaria vector, Anopheles stephensi, to Plasmodium berghei ANKA strain
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.