Abstract

Detailed, long-term datasets on the life histories of long-lived species such as great apes are necessary to understand their survival patterns but are relatively rare. Such information requires prolonged and consistent record-keeping over many generations, so for chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), this equates to many decades of input. As life history variables can be altered by differences in environmental influences (whether natural or artificial), there is substantial value to being able to compare across populations. Here, we present the first comparative analysis of life history data for two ex situ chimpanzee populations residing in North America (1975–2020; n = 730) and Japan (1980–2020; n = 660). Overall, survival patterns were similar between regions, and the median life expectancy from birth is estimated at 35.7 (95% CI = [32.4–40.0]) years for females and 30.1 (27.3–34.3) years for males across both populations. Females who survive to their first birthday are estimated to survive 42.4 (40.0–46.3) years and males 35.5 (32.6–38.0) years. We found that birth type (wild-born or captive-born) did not influence survival patterns in either population, but there were differential effects of sex on longevity. In the America population, males had higher mortality rates than females, whereas in the Japan population we found no differences between the sexes. First year mortality did not differ between populations for males (18–20%), but for females it was lower in America (15%) compared to Japan (25%). Survival patterns of chimpanzees in the present study will be useful for future investigation into potential causes of regional differences and cross-species comparisons.

Highlights

  • Studying life history patterns of non-human primates is important for understanding the evolution of human life histories and senescence (Bronikowski et al, 2011)

  • Life expectancy at birth for hunter-gatherers ranges from 21–37 years across groups and between 26–43% of people survive to age 45 (Gurven & Kaplan, 2007), similar to what has been found in a wild (Wood et al, 2017) and a captive chimpanzee population (Havercamp et al, 2019)

  • We present life tables by age and sex and statistics for chimpanzee survival and life expectancy for both the America population living in zoos accredited by the Association of Zoos and Aquariums (AZA) and the Japan population living in zoos and one sanctuary

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Studying life history patterns of non-human primates is important for understanding the evolution of human life histories and senescence (Bronikowski et al, 2011). Chimpanzees are one of humans’ closest living relatives and have been studied for decades, which has allowed for the comparison of life history patterns to shed light on human evolution (e.g., Hawkes, Smith & Robson, 2009; Hill et al, 2001; Muller & Wrangham, 2014; Thompson et al, 2007; Wood et al, 2017; Davison & Gurven, 2021). Mammals live longer in captive environments such as zoos compared to in the wild, some long-lived species such as elephants and chimpanzees do not (Tidière et al, 2016)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call