Abstract

This paper presents a comparative analytical study on seismic response of low rise three storeys concrete frame reinforced with super-elastic material as rebar elements. The super-elastic shape memory alloy rebars were used as reinforcement in two plastic hinge zones of the frame, beam plastic hinge zones and column plastic hinge zones. The response of the frame structure with two different reinforced cases is compared to response of the frame structure reinforced with regular steel material. Nonlinear dynamic time history analysis is performed in this study. Three different great earthquake ground motions were used to determine the seismic response of the frame structures in terms of frame top displacement time history and inter-storey drift along the frame height for different cases of reinforcements. Results obtained from the analysis show that the seismic response of low rise frame reinforced with super-elastic SMA rebars is affected by the zone of which SMA rebar are used in reinforcement. The SMA column reinforcement is more effective than SMA beam reinforcement in reducing the frame response.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.