Abstract

Breast density is considered to be one of the major risk factors in developing breast cancer. High breast density can also affect the accuracy of mammographic abnormality detection due to the breast tissue characteristics and patterns. We reviewed variants of local binary pattern descriptors to classify breast tissue which are widely used as texture descriptors for local feature extraction. In our study, we compared the classification results for the variants of local binary patterns such as classic LBP (Local Binary Pattern), ELBP (Elliptical Local Binary Pattern), Uniform ELBP, LDP (Local Directional Pattern) and M-ELBP (Mean-ELBP). A wider comparison with alternative texture analysis techniques was studied to investigate the potential of LBP variants in density classification. In addition, we investigated the effect on classification when using descriptors for the fibroglandular disk region and the whole breast region. We also studied the effect of the Region-of-Interest (ROI) size and location, the descriptor size, and the choice of classifier. The classification results were evaluated based on the MIAS database using a ten-run ten-fold cross validation approach. The experimental results showed that the Elliptical Local Binary Pattern descriptors and Local Directional Patterns extracted most relevant features for mammographic tissue classification indicating the relevance of directional filters. Similarly, the study showed that classification of features from ROIs of the fibroglandular disk region performed better than classification based on the whole breast region.

Highlights

  • It is estimated that one in eight women have the chance of getting breast cancer in their life time [1].Cancer mortality rates show a slight decline compared to 2012 (15.2/100,000) and the predicted 2020 rate is 13.4/100,000 in Europe [2]

  • The experimental results showed that the Elliptical Local Binary Pattern descriptors and Local Directional Patterns extracted most relevant features for mammographic tissue classification indicating the relevance of directional filters

  • The method used histogram thresholding, contour growing and polynomial fitting method to remove the pectoral muscle from the breast tissue region

Read more

Summary

Introduction

It is estimated that one in eight women have the chance of getting breast cancer in their life time [1].Cancer mortality rates show a slight decline compared to 2012 (15.2/100,000) and the predicted 2020 rate is 13.4/100,000 in Europe [2]. It is estimated that one in eight women have the chance of getting breast cancer in their life time [1]. Though physical examination is recommended, with this it is difficult to determine breast cancer in its early stages. A variety of medical imaging modalities help in early diagnosis of breast cancer; e.g., mammography, MRI, ultrasound and tomosynthesis. Irrespective of advanced imaging modalities, mammography is still considered as the golden standard for breast screening programs. Mammographic density, the relative amount of radiodense tissue, has been considered as a strong risk factor for developing breast cancer (together with gender, age, gene-mutations and family history) [9]. Women with high breast density have a higher tendency to develop breast cancer with a two to six-fold increased risk compared

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call