Abstract

Geological conditions are often complex during rock engineering construction (such as blasting and drilling) and usually involve rocks of several or multiple lithologies. However, comparative studies on the dynamic mechanical response of rocks of different lithologies are relatively few. To study differences in dynamic mechanical properties and energy dissipation of rocks of different lithologies, three kinds of rock that are common in rock engineering and have large differences in wave impedance were selected: red sandstone, gray sandstone, and granite. Samples of these three rocks were subjected to impact compression tests at different impact speeds, and the rock fragments after impact compression were screened to quantify the degree of fragmentation. The characteristics of stress wave propagation, dynamic stress-strain relationships, degree of fragmentation, and energy dissipation laws of the three rock types were compared and studied. The results show the following: (1) affected by the wave impedance matching relationship, the reflected waves, strain rates, and reflected energy of the three kinds of rock showed significant differences under the same incident stress wave. (2) The dynamic mechanical characteristics and energy dissipation laws of the rocks all had obvious strain rate effects, but the dynamic uniaxial compressive strength and energy dissipation density of the three rock types had different sensitivities to the strain rate. (3) The change trend of the energy utilization efficiency of the gray sandstone with incident energy was different from that of the red sandstone and granite; there was no obvious extreme point in the incident energy range. The three kinds of rock required different incident energies to reach maximum energy utilization efficiency. (4) The equivalent average fragment size of the three rock types decreased as a function of power with increasing impact velocity and energy dissipation density. (5) Under the same incident wave, although the reflection energy, transmission energy, and degree of fragmentation of the three kinds of rock showed significant differences, the differences in dissipation energy were small.

Highlights

  • Many engineering fields, such as blasting engineering, protection engineering, and seismic exploration, involve the propagation and attenuation of stress waves in rock masses and the deformation and destruction of rock masses under dynamic loads [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]

  • The process of stress waves acting on rocks involves the inflow, accumulation, dissipation, and outflow of energy, and energy changes throughout the entire process of rock deformation and failure. e relationship between energy consumption, fragmentation degree, and block distribution is a basic problem of rock fragmentation [17,18,19,20]. erefore, studying the mechanical response and energy dissipation of rocks under high strain rates is of great significance to engineering fields such as rock breaking and protection

  • E split Hopkinson bar has the advantages of simple structure, convenient operation, accurate measurement results, and good repeatability. erefore, it has been widely used in the investigation of the dynamic mechanical behavior of rock materials

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Many engineering fields, such as blasting engineering, protection engineering, and seismic exploration, involve the propagation and attenuation of stress waves in rock masses and the deformation and destruction of rock masses under dynamic loads [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. Erefore, studying the mechanical response and energy dissipation of rocks under high strain rates is of great significance to engineering fields such as rock breaking and protection. Regarding the excavation of coal mine rock tunnels, studying the dynamic mechanical properties and energy consumption of rocks can provide a basis for fine blasting, protection of surrounding rocks, optimization of blasting, and support parameters. Erefore, it is necessary to conduct comparative study and analysis on the dynamic mechanical characteristics, energy dissipation, and stress wave propagation laws of different rock lithologies to provide some basis for the selection of explosives, optimization of blasting parameters, and development of new drilling equipment. Erefore, three kinds of rock that are common in rock engineering and have large differences in wave impedance were selected. e split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) test system was used to perform impact compression tests under the same test conditions. e rock fragments after impact crushing were screened to quantify the degree of fragmentation. e characteristics of stress wave propagation, dynamic stress-strain relationship, degree of fragmentation, and energy dissipation of three kinds of rock were compared and studied. e results provide a reference for the selection of blasting engineering parameters, control of surrounding rock stability, and research on the mechanism of rockburst

Experimental Material and Setup
Results and Analysis
Discussion
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call