Abstract
Counter-rotating (CR) compressor is a potential configuration to increase the thrust-to-weight ratio of aero-engines. The present study numerically investigated a dual-stage CR compressor by solving unsteady Reynolds-averaged Naiver–Stokes equations. The unsteady flow mechanisms were analyzed and compared for swept and baseline (radially stacked) CR rotors. Both of these rotor configurations were numerically simulated for the entire design speed line. The unsteady flow field near the mid-span and blade tip characterized by tip leakage vortex (TLV) was analyzed in detail for both near peak efficiency (NPE) and near stall (NS) conditions. According to the results, blade loading of the second rotor (R2) was much higher than that of the first rotor (R1). Moreover, the blade loading was higher in the swept rotors in comparison with the baseline CR rotors. In both baseline and swept CR compressors, the potential effect of R2 on the static pressure distribution of R1 was more significant compared to the opposite effect. Under the NS condition, the potential effect was confined in the rear zone of R1 where the potential flow of R2 passed. Despite the obvious impact of wake-induced negative jet on the flow field of R2 blade passage, the static pressure of R2 blade exhibited no evident variation except at 90% spanwise position. Although the blade loading of the swept CR compressor was increased, the potential effect of R2 on R1 was considerably reduced due to growth of axial gap between R1 and R2. Since the blade sweep improved the flow field, the wake passing effect on R2 was more moderate compared to that of the baseline CR compressor. The perturbation velocity magnitude of the swept CR compressor was approximately half of that of the baseline CR compressor. The TLV of R2 was periodically disturbed, and therefore, low axial velocity patches were observed on the TLV trajectory of R2. In addition, the swept CR compressor exhibited smaller low axial velocity patches of TLV due to weaker aerodynamic interaction between R1 and R2.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.