Abstract

As one popular supercritical CO2 (sCO2) power cycle, the recompression cycle has attracted various modifications. However, comparative studies are still required to determine whether these modifications are necessary. In this paper, three modifications on the original recompression cycle(I) are compared, which are reheating cycle(II), partial cooling cycle(III), and reheated partial cooling cycle(IV). Thermodynamic states are calculated based on the recuperator effectiveness, and the split ratio, reheating pressure and pre-cooling pressure are calculated by genetic algorithm (GA). The thermal efficiencies are calculated as 40.01%, 40.44%, 39.88%, and 41.63%. The exergy efficiencies are 55.49%, 56.07%, 55.27% and 57.69%. It reveals that only reheated partial cooling cycle improves the performance, neither reheating cycle nor partial cooling cycle. This conclusion is not limited to specific parameters as the parametric study indicates. One explanation from the exergy analysis is that the reheated partial cooling cycle combines the edges of both reheating and partial cooling modifications.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.