COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE YANG-MONTI CHANNEL AND APPENDIX FOR CONTINENT DIVERSION IN THE MITROFANOFF AND MALONE PRINCIPLES

Abstract

Continent conduits for Mitrofanoff and Malone procedures are widely used for incontinence management. Because the appendix is not always suitable or available, Monti proposed a transversely retubularized short segment of ileum. We present our experience and compare outcomes according to the type of conduit. In a retrospective study from 1988 to 2003 case notes were reviewed specifying conduit characteristics, underlying disease, overall surgical management of incontinence and subsequent complications. Comparison was based on followup, details of complications and treatments. In 32 men and 14 women with a total of 65 conduits (Mitrofanoff in 41 and Malone procedure in 24) the condition was spina bifida in 29, bladder exstrophy in 5 and sacral agenesia in 3. Other cases included various origins. Mean age at operation was 14.2 years (range 1 to 31). Mean followup was 5.3 years (range 1 to 14.7). Appendix was used in 23 cases and a Yang-Monti channel was performed in 18 (ileum in 7 and sigmoid in 11) for urinary diversion. The Malone procedure was performed using appendix in 11 cases and a Yang-Monti tube in 13. At followup 61 conduits (93.8%) were in use and 4 (6.2%) were abandoned. Complications were cutaneous stenosis, kink blockage and stomal leakage. No significant differences were observed between the types and purposes of the conduit. With constant availability and various possibilities of construction the Yang-Monti channel is recommended for continent diversion creation when appendix does not look suitable or is already in use or absent.