Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this investigation was to compare and evaluate the treatment effects of two commonly used removable functional appliances. Materials and methodsThe subjects, 12 children, were all diagnosed as having maxillary protrusion. They were divided into two treatment groups: the bionator group, comprising 3 boys and 3 girls, mean age 11.3 years at the start of treatment; and the bite jumping appliance (BJA) group, comprising 5 boys and one girl, mean age 10.9 years at the start of treatment. Lateral cephalograms in the intercuspal position were taken both at the beginning and at the end of use of each appliance. ResultsIn comparison of treatment effects between both groups, the BJA group showed greater lingual inclination of the maxillary incisors and labial inclination of the mandibular incisors compared with the bionator group. Also, the BJA group showed a significantly greater forward and downward change in the inclination of the occlusal plane than did the bionator group. ConclusionsIn terms of treatment mechanics, the bionator and BJA are quite different. Therefore, the proper use of each depends on symptoms, sequence of use, and time of initiation of therapy in order to provide the most effective treatment of Class II malocclusions.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
