Abstract

The comparison between three classical potentials and density functional theory (DFT) is performed mainly for divacancy and hexavacancy in Si crystal. According to their performances on the formation energies and structural properties (distortion magnitude, relaxation volume and symmetry), the limitations and validities of classical potentials are discussed. It is found that the outward relaxation directions of EDIP and Tersoff (T3) are contrary to the DFT and Stillinger–Weber (SW) directions (inward), which restrict their application in the structural property calculations. Except for the divacancy symmetries, the results of SW are in agreement with the DFT results. Thus, it can be concluded that SW should be the best potential to describe V 2 and V 6.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.