Abstract
Effective and safe induction of labour is crucial in modern obstetric practice. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of sublingual misoprostol versus dinoprostone gel in inducing labour. A prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted at a tertiary care hospital. A total of 828 pregnant women requiring labour induction were randomly assigned to receive either sublingual misoprostol (n=414) or dinoprostone gel (n=414). The primary outcome was the success rate of labour induction, defined as vaginal delivery within 24 hours. Secondary outcomes included the time interval from induction to delivery, incidence of hyperstimulation syndrome, mode of delivery, and maternal and neonatal outcomes. Data were analyzed using SPSS, with statistical significance set at p
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: International Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
