Comparative study of static and dynamic design analysis of RCC school building

Abstract

Purpose: The present study deals in the zone 5 and for school building which constructed in district mandi, Himachal Pradesh. A multi-storied framed school structure of (G+3) pattern is selected. Linear seismic analysis is done for the building by static method using STAAD-Pro as per the IS-1893-2002-Part-1 and dynamic method (Response Spectrum Method) using STAAD-Pro as per the IS-1893-2016-Part-1. A comparison is done between the static and dynamic analysis, the results such as Bending moment, area of steel required, compared and summarized for Beams, Columns and Structure as a whole during both the analysis.Design/methodology: In this research comparative study of static and dynamic analysis of structure has been done by the STAAD. Pro software. Schools, hospitals and institutional buildings are the major structures. These structures require proper structural design, detailing and construction. For the safety and stability of the building researcher use STAAD. Pro software which gives economical and efficient Output.Findings: The present study found that the loads, moments, area of steel are different for different methods. The comparison has been done in the tabular form. Dynamic method is necessary in the zone 5 which is severe to earthquake. For the further research, zone, soil type and importance factors of the structure can be changed as per the researcher requirement.Research limitations: The analysis of such type of buildings is not fully explored for different zones and soil conditions.Practical Implications: Practical implications are related to the behaviour of structures in the earthquake excitation, especially to understand the response of structure in zone 5.Originality/value: Analysis of G+3 RCC School Building