Comparative study of source–drain contact metals for amorphous InGaZnO thin‐film transistors

Abstract

AbstractIn this work, we compared the thin‐film transistor (TFT) characteristics of amorphous InGaZnO TFTs with six different source–drain (S/D) metals (MoCr, TiW, Ni, Mo, Al, and Ti/Au) fabricated in bottom‐gate bottom‐contact (BGBC) and bottom‐gate top‐contact (BGTC) configurations. In the BGTC configuration, nearly every metal can be injected nicely into the a‐IGZO leading to nice TFT characteristics; however, in the BGBC configuration, only Ti/Au is injected nicely and shows comparable TFT characteristics. We attribute this to the metal‐containing deposits in the channel and the contact oxidation during a‐IGZO layer sputtering in the presence of S/D metal. In bias‐stress stability, TFTs with Ti/Au S/D metal showed good results in both configurations; however, in the BGTC configuration, not all the TFTs showed as good bias results as Ti/Au S/D metal TFTs. We attribute this to backchannel interface change, which happened because of the metal‐containing deposits at the backchannel during the final the SiO2 passivation.