Abstract
The paper presents a detailed comparative study of three surface soil moisture datasets retrieved from Cosmic-Ray Soil Moisture Observing System (COSMOS) in situ neutron measurement, CATDS Soil Moisture Ocean Salinity (SMOS) satellite microwave observations, and modelled data of the Global Land Data Assimilation System (GLDAS). Subsurface datasets were also calculated from the in situ and satellite measurements by using an exponential filter and were compared with the GLDAS estimates. For these comparisons, the Triple Collocation (TC) method, Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) coefficients, trend charts, and scatterplots were used.The main goal of this work was to verify the concordance of cosmic-ray neutron measurements with low-resolution soil moisture data from the CATDS SMOS and GLDAS products. The second objective was to determine the possibility of obtaining comparable subsurface soil moisture products from the aforementioned soil moisture data source.The obtained results show that data from the COSMOS sensor, which assesses soil moisture in an area 600m in diameter, agree reasonably well with the CATDS SMOS and GLDAS data having spatial resolution of about 25km. These conclusions suggest that COSMOS Derlo measurements can be particularly useful for validation of low-resolution satellite soil moisture observations as well as modelled values.The results obtained by using the TC method also revealed satisfactory agreement among all studied surface soil moisture data.However, the performed analysis shows some preponderance of SMOS and COSMOS data over GLDAS products. Although GLDAS data show a noticeable smoothing effect, COSMOS and CATDS SMOS more effectively reveal temporal soil moisture changes. Thus, for some applications, the use of CATDS SMOS estimates rather than GLDAS products may be more appropriate.Results retrieved by using an exponential filter are significant and encouraging. In particular, subsurface soil moisture values calculated from CATDS SMOS show stronger correlation with COSMOS Derlo data than those of GLDAS. Furthermore, COSMOS Derlo data also respond more intensively to surface soil moisture changes.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.