Abstract
The teratogenic activity of xenobiotics is usually investigated by examinating visceral and skeletal abnormalities of term fetuses. Although the rodent fetal skeleton is only partially ossified, the single stain for bone is the most commonly used method in routine teratology testing, while the double stain for evaluation of both bone and cartilage is often used only in basic research. The present work compares data obtained from rat fetuses using the two methods after exposure to the teratogenic agent sodium valproate at specific embryonic stages of development. Pregnant rats were treated with 400 mg/kg sodium valproate and sacrificed at term of pregnancy. Even if both methods were able to identify sodium valproate as a teratogenic molecule, correct and complete interpretation of data was possible only by using the double stain. Our results show the inability of the single stain to correctly discriminate between major and minor abnormalities.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
