Abstract

Objective: To compare short-term efficacy,effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy(LPD) learning curve at different stages and at the same time with open pancreaticoduodenectomy(OPD). Methods: Clinical data of 488 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy at Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery,Affiliated Tongji Hospital,Tongji Medical College,Huazhong University of Science and Technology from July 2014 to December 2016 were collected. There were 40 cases at the groping stage of LPD surgery(100 cases at the same time of OPD),64 cases at the stable stage (89 cases at the same time of OPD),and 118 cases at the mature stage(77 cases at the same time of OPD).The clinical data of LPD and OPD in the same period were compared and analyzed by χ2 test,t test and U test,respectively. Results: There was no significant difference in preoperative indicators between the two groups at the three stages(all P>0.05). In terms of intraoperative blood volume of the LPD group was significantly lower than that of the OPD group at three stages(M(QR))(111.1(150.0)ml(range:0 to 700 ml) vs. 393.9(400.0)ml(range:0 to 3 000 ml),120.8(115.0)ml(range:0 to 1 000 ml) vs. 442.9(450.0)ml(range:0 to 2 000 ml) and 150.0(200.0)ml(range:10 to 1 500 ml) vs. 364.3(400.0)ml(range:0 to 1 500 ml))(all P<0.05). And in terms of operation time of the LPD group was significantly higher than that of the OPD group at the groping stage((461.1±123.9)min(range:220 to 690 minutes) vs. (385.9±113.9)minutes(range:150 to 655 minutes))(P<0.05),and there was no significant difference between the LPD group and the OPD group at the stable and mature stage(P>0.05). The incidence of B+C level pancreatic fistula of the LPD group was higher than that of the OPD group at groping stage(17.5% vs. 3.0%)(P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the LPD group and the OPD group at the stable and mature stage(P>0.05). The incidence of postoperative rebleeding(27.5%),bile leakage(20.0%) and abdominal infection(20.0%) of the LPD group was higher than those of the OPD group(11.0%(11/100),5.0%(5/100) and 7.0%(7/100)) at groping stage. There were no significant differences between the LPD group and the OPD group at the stable and mature stage(P>0.05). There were no significant differences of incidence gastrointestinal leakage,hepatic failure,renal failure,cardiac failure,pulmonary infection and 30-day death between the LPD group and the OPD group(all P>0.05). The incidence rate of gastroplegia in the LPD group was lower than that in the OPD group at the stable and mature stage(26.5%(17/64) vs. 44.9%(40/89) and 24.5%(29/118) vs. 38.9%(30/77))(all P<0.05),there was no significant difference between the LPD group and the OPD group at the groping stage(P>0.05). In terms of other incidence of complications,there were no significant differences between the LPD group and the OPD group at three stages(all P>0.05). There were no significant differences of positive margin rate of pancreas,bile duct,retroperitoneum,vascular channel,uncinate process and rate of R0 resection between the LPD group and the OPD group at three stages(all P>0.05). In terms of numbers of lymph nodes,there was no significant difference between the LPD group and the OPD group at three stages(all P>0.05).Postoperative hospital stay of the LPD group was shorter than that of the OPD group at the stable stage((14.8±6.9)days(range:10 to 38 days) vs. (17.0±9.0)days(range:4 to 56 days)) and the mature stage((13.0±7.4)days(range:3 to 57 days) vs. (15.8±6.7)days(range:6 to 69 days)(all P<0.05). Conclusion: with the stable and mature learning curve of LPD surgery,compared with traditional OPD surgery,it has the characteristics of less intraoperative bleeding,shorter postoperative hospitalization,lower incidence of delay gastric empty,safe and effective.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.