Comparative study of prophylaxis with high and low doses of voriconazole in children with malignancy.

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Children with acute myeloid leukemia and relapses of leukemia are at high risk of developing fungal infections and need antifungal prophylaxis. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and toxicity of two different dosage regimens of voriconazole (VRC) during prophylactic administration in children with malignancy and neutropenia.Materials and Methods: This prospective study was conducted at the Belarusian Research Center for Pediatric Oncology, Hematology, and Immunology from May 2017 to December 2019. The present study included 21 Caucasian patients with malignant hematological diseases (20 patients with acute myeloid leukemia and relapses of leukemia and 1 patient with Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma) aged 2-18 years. All patients were randomly divided into two groups that received different dosage regimens of VRCZ prophylaxis. Patients in the “high-dose” group received VRCZ at a dose of 9 mg/kg twice a day PO, or 8 mg/kg twice a day IV without a loading dose (children of 2-11 and adolescents and of 12-14 years old with <50 kg weight body), or a dose of 4 mg/kg twice a day PO or IV (adolescents of 12-14 years old with ≥50 kg body weight and all adolescents over 14 years old). Patients in the “low-dose” group received VRCZ at a dose of 4 mg/kg twice a day, PO or IV, without a loading dose (children of 2-11 and adolescents of 12-14 years old with <50 kg body weight), or at a dose of 3 mg/kg twice a day, PO or IV (adolescents of 12-14 years old with ≥ 50 kg body weight and all adolescents over 14 years old). When neutropenia recurred (after the next chemotherapy block), the patients were re-randomized and prophylaxis was resumed in the absence of fungal infection. Therefore, some patients (n=12, 57%) entered the study several times (maximum four times, after each chemotherapy block). In total, 21 patients experienced 40 episodes of VRCZ prophylaxis.Results: In the high-dose group (n=20 episodes of prophylaxis), invasive fungal infections (IFI) signs were recorded in one (5%) case. In the low-dose group (n=20 episodes), IFI signs were observed in six (30%) cases (P=0.0375). The residual serum concentration was significantly higher in patients who received high doses of VRCZ (P<0.0001). Most patients with IFI (n=6, 86%) had a mean value (i.e., <0.74 μg/ml) of the residual serum concentration of the medication. Median of the first signs of fungal infection was 22 days from the start of prophylaxis. The dosage was the only highly significant factor that affected the metabolism of VRCZ. Conclusion: The likelihood of IFI was significantly lower in children who prophylactically received VRCZ in high doses (P=0.0375) and had ≥ 0.74 μg/ml residual serum concentration of the medication (P=0.0258). Residual serum concentration of VRCZ reached a plateau by day sixth of the treatment. In children, the dosage was the only highly significant factor affecting the metabolism of VRCZ.