Abstract

Objectives Total Hip replacement (THR) is now emerging as the most successful surgery that can drastically improve the quality of life of an arthritis patient. Bilateral (B/L) hip involvement is seen in many cases where there is a treatment option of operation on both hips in a single operation under single anesthesia or a staged operation. The present study aims to compare the pre-operative, operative, and post-operative parameters of single operation Bilateral Total Hip Replacement (B/L THR) and staged B/L THR (two operations in stages; second operation done after 6–7 days). Material and Methods 97 B/L THR cases were included in a retrospective cohort study operated Delete conducted 2017–2021 under a single surgeon in a tertiary care hospital. The age, sex, and Body Mass Index (BMI) - matched cases were divided into Group 1-single B/L THR and Group 2-staged B/L THR. The patients were assessed on blood loss during surgery and post-surgery up to 24 h, time to reach visual pain analog score of baseline 3, pre and post-operative Harris Hip score, post-operative hemoglobin (Hb) level, infection, dislocation, deep vein thrombosis and duration of hospital stay. Results Thirty-seven cases of Group 1 Single B/L THR and 60 cases of Group 2-Staged B/L THR were analyzed. The time taken for pain to decrease was more in Single B/L THR which was statistically significant. Even though the intra-operative and post operative blood loss was not statistically significant, still more number of cases showed greater blood loss in Staged B/L THR. The pre-operative and post-operative hip functionality outcome was statistically same in both groups. Complications like deep vein thrombosis (DVT) showed lower incidence in Single B/L THR; and equal incidence of infection in both groups. The duration of hospital stay was more in Staged B/L THR. The statistical significance of longer duration of pain in Staged B/L THR can be explained on basis of two injuries inflicted by two operations 6–7 days apart. Harris Hip score for assessing hip functionality did not show statistical significance indicating that both single and staged show similar improvement of hip function. Lower incidence of DVT in Staged B/L THR can be attributed to early mobilization and physiotherapy. Conclusion On the basis of the above study, we conclude that Single B/L THR is feasible, safe and cost-effective with similar functional outcomes and early return to the society. Therefore, it should be encouraged in tertiary care hospitals.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call