Abstract

PurposeTo compare the perioperative and survival outcomes of patients over 75 years and younger patients who received radical cystectomy.Patients and methodsA total of 119 patients aged ≥75 years and 488 patients aged <75 years were enrolled. All patients underwent radical cystectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection. Clinical characteristics and perioperative outcomes were compared between the two groups. Overall survival and progression-free survival were analyzed by using the Kaplan–Meier method. Cox regression analysis and logistic regression analysis were used to identify the risk factors affecting the outcomes observed.ResultsThere was no significant difference in perioperative complications between the elderly patient group and the younger patient group (p = 0.349). The 5-year overall survival of elderly patients was lower than that of young patients (p < 0.001). Age ≥75 years was a risk factor for overall survival (HR = 1.69 [95% CI: 1.22–2.35]; p = 0.002) and progression-free survival (HR = 1.69 [95% CI: 1.14–2.50]; p = 0.008) for patients who received radical cystectomy but was not a poor risk factor for major complications (HR = 1.25 [95% CI: 0.47–3.31]; p = 0.658) after radical cystectomy. In addition, preoperative renal insufficiency was associated with a higher risk of major complications.ConclusionIn our cohort, compared with younger patients, elderly patients aged ≥75 years had worse survival outcomes, but age ≥75 years was not a risk factor for major complications after radical cystectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection. Radical surgery should be encouraged for elderly patients who can tolerate aggressive treatments.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.