Comparative study of optimization methods for building energy consumption and daylighting performance

Abstract

When striving for sustainable development, designers encounter the formidable task of integrating the advantages of daylighting into energy-efficient designs. The process of investigating a multitude of design variables can be arduous and time-intensive. However, computational simulations provide indispensable insights into forecasting performance. A considerable number of these design challenges do not have explicit mathematical solutions; thus, black-box optimization techniques are favored for the purpose of determining the most effective design solutions. Popular meta-heuristic optimization algorithms, including the Genetic Algorithm (GA), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA), Sine Cosine Algorithm (SCA), Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO), Ant Lion Optimizer (ALO), and Multi-Verse Optimizer (MVO), are described and thoroughly analyzed in this article. In addition, the present study run empirical studies to compare these optimization algorithms by applying them to tackle five distinct daylighting and energy optimization problems associated with enhancing building performance. In the test cases, the present study results demonstrate that the PSO and MVO algorithms exhibit better performance compared to the GA and WOA algorithms. The selection of the most suitable algorithm is contingent upon the distinctive attributes of the problem, and the intricacy of the optimization landscape.