Comparative study of onlay versus sublay mesh repair in the management of ventral hernias.

Abstract

Ventral hernias with large defects (≥ 2cm) are managed with tension free mesh repair. The growing consensus that sublay (retrorectus) mesh repair is superior to onlay mesh repair due to fewer complications is based on literature dominated by retrospective studies from high and upper-middle income countries. There is thus a need of more prospective studies from various countries to resolve the controversy. The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of onlay versus sublay mesh repair in the management of ventral hernias. Our single centre, prospective comparative study set in a low-middle income country comprised of 60 patients with a ventral hernia undergoing open surgical repair using either onlay technique (n = 30) or sublay technique (n = 30). Surgical site infections, seroma formation, recurrence were found in 3.33%, 6.67%, 0% patients in sublay repair group and in 16.67%, 20%, 6.67% patients in onlay repair group respectively. Mean duration of surgery, mean Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score for chronic pain, mean duration of hospital stay were 46min, 4.5, 8days in onlay repair group and 61min, 4.2, 6days in sublay repair group respectively. Onlay repair group was associated with shorter duration of surgery. However, sublay repair was associated with lesser rates of surgical site infections, chronic pain and recurrence than onlay repair. Sublay mesh repair had better outcomes than onlay mesh repair for the management of ventral hernias, however superiority of any one technique could not be established.