Abstract
Recent studies support the addition of new immunosuppressive drugs as cytolytic induction therapy in cardiac transplantation. We carried out a comparative study comprising 52 patients who had undergone cardiac transplantation at our center. Thirty patients received muromonab-CD3 (OKT3, Janssen-Cilag, The Netherlands) as the induction therapy, whereas 22 patients received Daclizumab (Zenapax, Hoffman-La Roche, Nutley, NJ, USA) instead. All patients received cyclosporine or tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and steroids. Over an average follow-up period of 23.21 ± 18 months, we analyzed retrospectively the incidence of grade ≥3A biopsy-confirmed acute rejection episodes, the presence of infectious processes at 1 and 6 months, the occurrence of significant secondary effects, and the necessity to modify the immunosuppressive therapy during the follow-up. The results suggest that daclizumab is linked to a decreased incidence of grade ≥3A biopsy-confirmed acute rejection and to a reduced necessity to modify the immunosuppressive therapy during the medium-term follow-up.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
