Abstract

We investigated the sensitivities of 2-dimensional (2D) magnetic resonance sialography (MR-S) and unilateral sagittal and axial 3-dimensional (3D) MR-S using a surface coil and their combination in diagnosing patients with Sjögren's syndrome (SS). We retrospectively analyzed the 3D and 2D MR-S results of 78 patients with SS. We evaluated the sensitivities of multiple high-signal-intensity spots and staging on MR sialograms and analyzed the efficient imaging methods and cross section for diagnosing patients with SS. The sensitivities of MR-S for detecting abnormal findings (i.e., MR-S stage 1 or higher) were as follows: 65 cases (83.3% [95% confidence interval (CI): 73.2–90.8]) for unilateral sagittal 3D MR-S; 62 cases (79.4% [95% CI: 68.8–87.8]) for axial 3D MR-S; 66 cases (84.6% [95% CI: 74.7–91.8]) for combined unilateral sagittal and axial 3D MR-S; and 32 cases (41.0% [95% CI: 30.0–52.7]) for bilateral sagittal 2D MR-S. The ratio of the abnormal finding of MR-S was tested using the two-tailed Fisher's exact test. Unilateral sagittal, axial, and combined unilateral sagittal and axial 3D MR-S showed significantly higher sensitivity than bilateral sagittal 2D MR-S, respectively (P < 0.001). Most cases upstaged by 3D MR-S were those positive (stage 1 or higher) among the stage 0 cases detected by 2D MR-S. Axial 3D MR-S, compared with 2D MR-S, understaged four cases, which was due to the imaging range of the axial 3D MR-S. We concluded that a single unilateral sagittal 3D MR-S was sufficient and axial 3D MR-S was unnecessary for SS staging. T1- and T2-weighted images are essential for investigating the salivary glands in patients with SS. Therefore, we also concluded that bilateral sagittal 3D MR-S of the parotid glands in addition to T1- and T2-weighted imaging is necessary, sufficient, and most efficient for precise MR imaging examination of the salivary glands, including diagnosing SS.

Highlights

  • Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has become widely used for assessing salivary gland diseases and is useful for the diagnosis of Sjogren’s syndrome (SS)

  • In the imaging analysis for the staging of MR-S, which indicates the detection of the multiple high-signal-intensity spots (MHS) and measurement of the diameter of the MHS, the kappa values for the interobserver agreement of the sagittal 3D MR-S, axial 3D MR-S, and sagittal 2D MR-S were 0.92 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.808–1.02), 0.96, and 0.85, respectively

  • Most cases designated as stage 2 or higher based on 3D MR sialography (MRS) could be designated as stage 1 or higher by 2D MR-S (Figure 3)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has become widely used for assessing salivary gland diseases and is useful for the diagnosis of Sjogren’s syndrome (SS). MR-S was performed using a high-resolution technique and a heavily T2-weighted 3D fast-spin-echo sequence (TR/TE/number of signal-intensity acquisitions, 5000/602–675 ms/2) according to a previous report that a heavily T2-weighted 3D fast-spin-echo sequence is the most suitable for the evaluation of thin salivary gland ducts (section thickness: 1 mm, gapless image, number of slices: 20, pixel size: 0.45–0.55 mm × 0.55–0.79 mm, FOV: 200 mm; scan time: 185 s) [21]. Two oral and maxillofacial radiologists with 11 and 19 years of experience, respectively, evaluated the coded and randomly presented unilateral sagittal 3D MR-S, axial 3D MR-S, and bilateral sagittal 2D MR-S for the presence or absence of MHS based on a previous report [6] Both radiologists were blinded to the histopathological grading and T1- and T2weighted imaging findings. EZR software (Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan), providing a graphical interface for R (v3.2.2; e R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria), was used for statistical analyses

Results
Discussion
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call