Abstract
The cardiac and coronary vasodilator effects of MDL 17043 and MDL 19205 were compared in isolated, blood-perfused papillary muscle, sinoatrial (SA) node, and atrioventricular (AV) node preparations of dogs. In these preparations, MDL 17043 (0.01-3 mumol) and MDL 19205 (0.01-3 mumol) were injected intra-arterially. Both drugs increased the force of contraction of papillary muscles paced at a rate of 120 stimuli/min, and a ten-fold increase in dose produced about a 100% increase in the force. The two drugs increased the sinus rate in SA node preparations, and a tenfold increase in dose resulted in about a 12% increase in sinus rate with MDL 17043 and about a 17% increase with MDL 19205. These drugs increased the rate of automaticity of spontaneously beating papillary muscles and also the force of contraction. With a ten-fold increase in dose, the increase in the rate was about 16% for MDL 17043 and about 9% for MDL 19205. No ventricular arrhythmias were produced by either drug. The drugs equally decreased AV conduction time by accelerating AV nodal conduction in AV node preparations whose right atria were paced at a rate of 150 stimuli/min. However, the decrease remained about 5% with a ten-fold increase in dose of both drugs. No AV junctional tachycardia was produced. In all preparations, both drugs increased (coronary) blood flow. In paced papillary muscle preparations a tenfold increase in dose resulted in about a 37% increase in blood flow with MDL 17043 and about a 42% increase with MDL 19205.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.