Abstract

LANGUAGE NOTE | Document text in English; abstract also in Chinese.
 The purposes of this study were to use the teacher preparation models of graduate programs from Capital Sports University, Education University of Hong Kong, and National Taiwan Normal University as examples, to analyze and compare the differences in the aspects of program development, aims of program, recruitment policies and curriculum system these four difference regions. The results of this study illustrated the diverse teacher preparation models from three different educational systems, cultures, and teacher preparation models, would greatly help experts to understand these differences, and learn from each other.
 本研究以首都體育學院、香港教育大學、臺灣師範大學的體育專業研究生培養模式為例,從三所高校的發展歷程、培養目標、招生制度、課程體系四個方面做比較研究,從而分析和對比中國大陸與香港、臺灣地區高校體育專業研究生培養模式的差異及優缺點,通過比較與借鑒擁有“中西合璧”風格的香港、臺灣地區的體育學研究生教育方式,優化和改革中國大陸體育研究生教育的課程結構、內容、培養方式等措施,以提高我國體育專業研究生的教育品質。

Highlights

Read more

Summary

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.