Abstract

Over the last couple of decades, governments in developing and developed economies/countries have shown interest in the public-private partnership (PPP) policy. Different governments have different reasons for adopting the PPP concept. This paper aims to investigate the differences and similarities on the reasons for implementing PPP in develop-ing and developed economies/countries, represented by Ghana and Hong Kong. An empirical questionnaire survey was conducted with relevant experienced practitioners in both jurisdictions. One hundred and three completed questionnaires were returned for analysis. The results from the non-parametric test show five reasons with significant differences. Reasons related to the economic and social benefits of PPP are ranked higher in Ghana, whereas efficiency and quality service related reasons are ranked higher in Hong Kong. Further, two reasons for adopting PPP emerged as very important in both jurisdictions; these include: “promotes quick delivery of public infrastructure projects” and “allows for shared risks”. The outputs of this study contribute to the international best practice framework for PPP. International private investors would be informed of the expectations of governments when engaging in PPP arrangement particularly in Asia and Africa.

Highlights

  • The public-private partnership (PPP) policy has been practiced for some time in both developing and developed countries/economies (Zhang, 2005; Osborne, 2002; Osei-Kyei & Chan, 2015a)

  • This paper has empirically compared the reasons for implementing PPP policy in developing and developed economies/countries using Ghana and Hong as examples

  • An empirical questionnaire survey was conducted with relevant experienced practitioners in both Ghana and Hong Kong

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The public-private partnership (PPP) policy has been practiced for some time in both developing and developed countries/economies (Zhang, 2005; Osborne, 2002; Osei-Kyei & Chan, 2015a). It has become the preferred procurement option by many governments to provide public infrastructure and services (Chou & Pramudawardhani, 2015; Hodge, Greve, & Boardman, 2010; Akintoye, Beck, & Hardcastle, 2008). PPP offers governments the opportunity to develop ‘value for money’ and modernized public infrastructure compared to the traditional bid-build system W. Chan, Cheung, & Ke, 2009; Cheung, Chan, & Kajewski, 2009a)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call