Abstract
This paper describes the measurement of wall thinning by continuous wave electromagnetic acoustic resonance (CW-EMAR) and pulse wave electromagnetic acoustic resonance (PW-EMAR). Simulated pipe wall thinning specimens are measured. The two methods show accurate results in the areas with a low variation of thickness, and the accuracy decreases when the thickness changes drastically. The two methods are analyzed by using the finite element method. The results show that with the increase of the bottom inclination, the accuracy of the two methods is reduced. For thin specimens, the reason for the larger error of CW-EMAR method is due to that CW-EMAR method is more easily affected by ultrasonic scattering and nonuniform distribution of static magnetic field.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Journal of the Japan Society of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
