Abstract

This single-centre retrospective cohort study aimed to clarify the superiority of treatment by comparing the outcomes of lymphaticovenular anastomosis with compression therapy and conservative treatment centred on compression therapy in the early stage of breast cancer-related lymphoedema. Data were collected from all patients treated for breast cancer-related lymphoedema between January 2015 and December 2022. The patients were classified into conservative treatment and surgical treatment groups. The upper extremity lymphoedema index value was calculated, based on five circumference values of the upper extremity and body mass index, to compare the 6-, 12-, 18- and 24-month outcomes between the groups. Of 101 patients with breast cancer-related lymphoedema, 81 (conservative treatment: 52; surgical treatment: 29) were included in the analysis. The therapeutic effect was significantly higher in the surgical treatment group than in the conservative treatment group, when comparing the rate of change in oedema at 6 (-6.6%±7.3% vs. 0.9%±7.5%; p<0.001), 12 (-7.3%±6.2% vs. 2.9%±8.6%; p<0.001), 18 (-7.6%±8.0% vs. 3.9%± 9.2%; p<0.001) and 24 (-5.6%±6.0% vs. 4.4%±10.7%; p<0.001) months. The incidence of cellulitis increased in the conservative treatment group (from 9.6% to 15.4%), whereas it was suppressed in the surgical treatment group (from 13.8% to 0%). Conservative treatment centred on compression therapy increased oedema over time; however, lymphaticovenular anastomosis with compression therapy effectively reduced oedema.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call