Comparative study of complications and final outcome between bone patellar tendon bone and hamstring auotgraft in ACL reconstruction

Abstract

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> <span lang="EN-IN">The most common current graft choices in ACL reconstruction are the bone-patellar tendon–bone (BPTB) graft and the quadrupled Hamstring graft. Though BPTB is considered to be the gold standard; hamstring tendon (HT) grafts have increased in popularity over last decade. Our aim in this study is to assess the complications, comorbidities, difficulties and final outcome between BPTB and Hamstring grafts in ACL reconstruction.</span></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> <span lang="EN-IN">71 male patients with isolated tear of ACL between age group of 18-45 years were included in the study. 35 patients in group A underwent ACL reconstruction using bone patellar tendon bone autograft and 35 patients in group B were managed by reconstructing ACL using quadrupled Hamstring autograft. All the patients in both the groups were followed up at 08 weeks,06 months and 01 year post surgery and evaluated by Lysholm knee scoring system</span>.<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> <span lang="EN-IN">The Lysholm scoring scale scores in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction showed that BPTB group and Hamstring group have similar outcome. One case (2.8%) each of patellar fracture and graft contamination occurred in BPTB group. There were 09 cases of superficial infection of which 03 were from BPTB group and 06 were from Hamstring group. </span></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> <span lang="EN-IN">There is statistically no significant difference in the overall clinical outcome between bone-patellar tendon- bone and Hamstring autografts. With precise surgical techniques, meticulous attention to sterility and proper wound closure most of the complications in both the techniques can be minimized or avoided.</span></p>