Abstract

Abstract. The least square plane fitting adjustment method has been widely used for registration of the mobile laser scanning (MLS) point clouds. The inputs for this process are the plane parameters and points of the corresponding planar features. These inputs can be manually and/or automatically extracted from the MLS point clouds. A number of papers have been proposed to automatically extract planar features. They use different criteria to extract planar features and their outputs are slightly different. This will lead to differences in plane parameters values and points of the corresponding features. This research studies and compares the results of the least square plane fitting adjustment process with different inputs obtained by using different segmentation methods (e.g. RANSAC, RDPCA, Cabo, RGPL) and the results from the point to plane approach – an ICP variant. The questions for this research are: (1) which is the more suitable method for registration of MLS sparse point clouds and (2) which is the best segmentation method to obtain the inputs for the plane based MLS point clouds registration? Experiments were conducted with two real MLS point clouds captured by the MDL – Dynascan S250 system. The results show that ICP is less accurate than the least square plane fitting adjustment. It also shows that the accuracy of the plane based registration process is highly correlated with the mean errors of the extracted planar features and the plane parameters. The conclusion is that the RGPL method seems to be the best methods for planar surfaces extraction in MLS sparse point clouds for the registration process.

Highlights

  • 1.1 General Instructionsmobile laser scanning (MLS) has become increasingly popular in many applications

  • In order to evaluate the impacts of the outputs from different segmentation approaches and to find the most suitable method for registration of the MLS sparse point clouds, this paper will compare the results of plane based matching approaches with the inputs provided by four different state of the art approaches: (1) RANSAC; (2) robust segmentation method

  • We firstly discussed about the minimum requirement for the success of the least square plane fitting adjustment model for the MLS point clouds registration process

Read more

Summary

General Instructions

MLS has become increasingly popular in many applications. In many MLS projects, in order to obtain the desired point density or obtain features which may be occluded by the presence of unwanted objects in other scans, the same area of interest may be scanned twice or more. In order to evaluate the impacts of the outputs from different segmentation approaches and to find the most suitable method for registration of the MLS sparse point clouds, this paper will compare the results of plane based matching approaches with the inputs provided by four different state of the art approaches: (1) RANSAC; (2) robust segmentation method.

Plane based fitting registration
RANSAC
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
Analysis of Scan area and plane fitting least square adjustment
Benchmarks
Iterative closest point
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call