Abstract

This study compares five methods to compute Hugoniots for porous materials, with experimental data for porous copper. The methods compare well when porosities are low. Three methods model shock velocity versus particle velocity data over a range of porosities with reasonable accuracy. P–v data are much more discriminatory and only two methods reproduce experimental data at high porosities with some degree of accuracy. Comparisons are made by plotting analytical results on curves fitted through experimental data points. Above certain porosities Hugoniot curves display anomalous behavior where (dP/dv)>0. A new method is presented which contains only two parameters {KT, and [(∂KT/∂P)]T} and which models both normal and anomalous Hugoniots curves.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.